If two line judges give conflicting calls on a ball landing inside the lines, what should the first referee decide?

In the situation where two line judges give conflicting calls regarding whether a ball landed in or out, the first referee has the authority to make the final decision. The correct choice to call the ball in reflects the principle that, in volleyball, when there is contradictory information from line judges, the referee's decision takes precedence, often siding with the call that favors the play, unless evidence clearly dictates otherwise.

Calling the ball in keeps the flow of the game and prevents unnecessary interruptions, as it supports the idea that the ball is considered in until proven otherwise by definitive evidence. This approach aligns with the spirit of volleyball, allowing players to maintain momentum and continue play uninterrupted.

Consulting with the line judges may create confusion or lead to a delay that is not necessary if their signals are in direct opposition. Ignoring the signals entirely may also disrupt the game’s rhythm and create dissatisfaction among players. Replay of the point would similarly hinder the progress of the match and might not align with the rules governing the sport. Thus, deciding in favor of the ball being in is a practical and sport-focused decision.